Buggy Website Screenshot as Seen on a Modern, W3c-compliant Browser

Yikes that picture doesn't look quite right! Have there been any compatibility issues on Vista 64-bit OS? Good example of coding discrepancies, great pic!

Good pic here.

Don't have / won't ever use, VISTA. I use XP 3rd, and on the second HDD, LINUX. If it weren't for needing some programs on XP/Windows (and my not yet understanding how to install WINE on Linux), I would forever leave M$ and all their deprecated, latent and buggy stuff.

This is a mild example. I 'fixed' itself a few hours later, but this is a typical 'mess-up' and upon examining the code, I stopped many dozens of old (like 10+ years outdated) code still in use.
I read about the upcoming "WINDOWS 7" I guess it is called... being heralded as 'what VISTA should have been and already, programmers are united that MOST of the problems with XP, VISTA and even 2000, have NOT be fixed!! It is supposed to be 'better?' -What did they change? We're talking re-arranging the chairs & tables on the Titanic I'm afraid... Not that much has changed ... :-(

I never had a compability problem with Firefox. I have though with IE and Chrome. Firefox rulez :)

I only use firefox and have never had a display like this one.

Thanks for the reminder! j

All Greek to me,but I'll endeavor to figure it out.Thanks for sharing!

I find Chrome quite fast, but there are issues with it.

If only Firefix was an OS! :-)

I used to use Internet Explorer and now I switched over to Firefox and I have noticed that the number of viruses, stalling, etc. has gone down significantly.